Skip to main content

A Vision of the Other

by David Wesley

A recent article in The Guardian questions how efforts to raise funds for Africa such as the recent Band Aid video often portrays the difference between Africans and those giving the funding in disparaging ways.

Conducting research that supports A Common Mission led to some unexpected discoveries.  One of these was the way that Africans perceived their partners in the U.S. and conversely how those in the U.S. perceived their partners in Africa. Beyond interviews I collected videos, articles and other information in which those in the U.S. described their partners in Africa.

Relationships that are heavily dependent on donors affect how congregations frame the ‘other’. Stories that are told and images used for securing funds may frame people in the host country in ways that depict the enormous difference between the donor and the recipient demonstrating bleak situations through the use of pictures that emphasize the extreme poverty.  An issue of the International Bulletin of Missionary Research (Oct. 2002) examined this very issue, demonstrating the stereotyping as well as sensationalism done through missionary photography.  Compounded with the need for raising funds, John Hutnyk (1996) describes how tourists often frame an image of a location such as Calcutta before they visit.  Tourists often take pictures of things which reinforce how they framed the location before going.  In Calcutta, for example, if the person framed Calcutta in terms of poverty, they will often take pictures that reinforce that image of poverty, even when they are surrounded by other possible images.  In STM or Congregational Partnerships the potential is that the images that are brought back from their experience to the congregation are often framed images emphasizing the “otherness.”  While the ideal is a blurred line between donor and recipient, the enormous need for financing through emotional appeals for donors and funding make that ideal a challenge.  The danger is forming relationships with reinforced boundaries of “otherness” instead of relationships with blurred boundaries.

A balance between relationship and project is a challenge that may not completely blur the line between donor and recipient.  Quality relationships, however, which seek to hear and understand the other is a common denominator in the short-term mission as well as congregational mission research literature as a necessary basis for healthy cross-cultural partnerships.

The following video and article about the funds that were raised through Band Aid to help with the Ebola Virus make this same argument.  Why I Had to Turn Down Band Aid

Channeling funds to address issues such as Ebola is something that expresses our common humanity as well as our faith. Portraying others in ways that does not strip their dignity is equally important. 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

When Partnership Becomes Personal

Although they are still in the minority of transnational church partnerships, healthy patterns of congregational partnerships that focus on relationship are becoming more and more common. The following article written by a colleague and student at Nazarene Theological Seminary, Lynne Bollinger gives an interesting perspective of the relationship factor in partnerships:                                                                       (see article at:  When Partnership Becomes Personal  )

Resources

Occasionally friends send me good resources that they have found related to short-term missions or partnerships. The following web-site is one of these.  The core principles in this post are consistent with the five healthy practices of partnerships found in Common Mission. The video on this post is especially interesting: How to Get Long Term Impact from Short Mission Trips

A Common Mission

By October 1 st  A Common Mission  should be available to order.  I am excited to share the stories and the findings from the research that formed the book.  This blog will be an on-going dialog for those who read the book.              Five patterns of healthy congregational partnerships form the framework of this book. These patterns emerge from research derived in congregations heavily involved in congregational partnerships. The congregations vary from mega churches of 7,000 congregants, to small churches of fifty members. The congregations surveyed represent a variety of theological traditions. Furthermore, the congregations maintain different approaches to partnership. Other than their Christian faith, the common strand among these congregations entails a commitment to a long-term relationship with another congregation, or area, beyond their own nationality. This commitment is based on a common mission. ...